FO:APFC/2000/7





ASIA-PACIFIC FORESTRY COMMISSION

Item 5(c) of the Provisional Agenda

EIGHTEENTH SESSION

Noosaville, Queensland, Australia, 15-19 May 2000

REGIONAL INITIATIVE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CRITERIA AND INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF DRY FORESTS IN ASIA

Secretariat Note

 

1. Criteria and indicators are tools used to define, assess and monitor sustainable forest management. Criteria encompass socio-economic, environmental, cultural and spiritual dimensions, with due consideration to the productive, protective and social roles of forests. Key indicators are measured and monitored to determine the effects of management interventions over time, in relation to progress towards sustainability, as defined by each criteria. The ultimate objective of criteria and indicators is to gradually improve forest management as a contribution toward achieving sustainable development.

2. Many Asia-Pacific countries are members of the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), which has actively supported member countries in adopting and implementing sustainable forest management, including environmentally sound harvesting techniques. ITTO pioneered the development of criteria for sustainable forest management by drafting the "ITTO Criteria for Sustainable Tropical Forest Management," which were endorsed by its member countries in 1992. The ITTO revised its criteria in 1997, to take into consideration recent trends and developments in forestry.

3. Five Asia-Pacific countries (i.e., Australia, China, Japan, Korea (Republic of) and New Zealand) also participate in the Montreal Process, which has developed criteria and indicators for monitoring progress toward sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests. In addition, ten ASEAN countries are also in the process of adapting the ITTO criteria and indicators for their use.

4. The seventeenth session of the Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission, held in February 1998, recognized the advances made by several countries in the development and application of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, but at the same time noted that many countries remained outside the established international processes. The Commission therefore requested FAO, in collaboration with partner organizations, to facilitate and enhance the involvement of such countries in understanding the potential of criteria and indicators for monitoring progress toward sustainable forest management.

5. The ongoing international initiatives involving Asia-Pacific countries largely focus on temperate, boreal and tropical moist forests. There was a perceived need, therefore, to more actively involve countries in the region with substantial areas of dry forests in the development and implementation of criteria and indicators specifically oriented toward the unique demands and features of dry forest management.

6. In response to this perceived need, a "Workshop on National-Level Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Management of Dry Forests in Asia" was organized by FAO, in cooperation with UNEP, ITTO, USDA Forest Service and the Indian Institute of Forest Management (IIFM). The workshop was held from 30 November to 3 December 1999, in Bhopal, India. Workshop participants included representatives of forestry agencies from nine countries with dry forests in Asia (i.e., Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Thailand), and representatives from FAO, ITTO, WWF/India, the Regional Community Forestry Training Center (RECOFTC), and IIFM.

OBJECTIVES OF THE WORKSHOP

7. The objectives of the workshop were to:

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE WORKSHOP

8. The following conclusions and recommendations were arrived at during the workshop:

COMMISSION CONSIDERATIONS

9. The Commission is invited to review the relevance of the "Regional Initiative for the Development and Implementation of National-Level Criteria and Indicators for the Sustainable Management of Dry Forests in Asia," and the recommendations of the regional workshop. If appropriate, the Commission may consider endorsing the initiative and providing recommendations on how it can effectively be implemented.